The University of Georgia
College of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences
Cooperative Extension Service
Managing the
High Producing Dairy Cow
Lane 0.
Ely and Larry D. Guthrie, Extension Dairy Scientists
Contents
40,000 Pounds
of Milk
Lactation/Gestation Cycle
Feeding
Maintaining Intake
Milking
Heat Stress
Management
Suggested Readings
All dairy farmers would like to increase milk production from their cows.
If we examine the DHIA records, milk production has been increasing steadily
over the years. Still there is a long way to go for the average herd to
become a top herd. What is a high producing dairy cow? Many herds today
have rolling herd averages of over 20,000 pounds of milk and many cows
are producing over 30,000 pounds of milk. The Georgia DHIA rolling herd
average, however, is 13,500 pounds of milk. To see what changes we can
make, let's examine the individual record holder.
Beecher Arlinda Ellen set the
production record in 1975 by producing 55,661 pounds of milk in 365 days
(Table 1). Her top production day was 195 pounds and she averaged 152.5
pounds of milk per day. She milked 112 pounds on her last test day. During
the peak of lactation she ate over 65 pounds of 16 percent commercial
grain, 70 pounds of alfalfa hay, and she drank 50 to 60 gallons of water
per day. Ellen was an exceptional cow in both milk production and her
ability to eat. She consumed over 7 percent of body weight as dry matter
the average cow eats 3 to 5 percent of her body weight. Ellen was fed
frequently and always had fresh feed available. Her owners commented on
her agressive eating habits and easy disposition. She liked interaction
with people and other animals.
We can see many of Ellen's
characteristics in the 20,000 pound herds. We want to be able to take
advantage of them so our cows can express their genetic potential and
efficiency. Even though costs will increase with higher production; returns
will increase more.
All cows go through a lactation/gestation
cycle which can be divided into five groupings. The first period of the
lactational cycle is peak milk production. During this period the high
producing cow must draw upon body reserves to meet her nutritional requirements.
Usually the high producing cow will lose body weight during this period.
The second period is when maximum
dry matter intake occurs. This level of intake will determine the shape
of the milk production curve as the cow starts to decline in milk production.
Body weight will stabilize and may show a slight increase. Cows should
be bred by the early part of this period in order to maintain a reasonable
calving interval.
The third period of the lactational
cycle is a period of excess nutrient intake and gain of body stores for
the next lactation. Body weight increases so that the cow reaches the
desired calving weight by the end of this period. This phase may not occur
in high producing herds because of the high level of milk production.
With high milk production, cows may never reach a period of excess nutrient
intake. The quality of the ration will be all the more critical because
the cow will not have a large body reserve to draw on in the subsequent
lactation.
The fourth period is the typical
dry cow period where the goal is to restore the rumen to a healthy fermentation
vat. This is accomplished by feeding a ration composed of long hay. Body
weight changes should be positive but not large.
The last period in the lactational
cycle is the close-up dry period. This is a transitional phase that allows
the cow to adjust to the milking herd ration and to being moved into the
milking herd.
Feeding the high producing
dairy cow is a continual challenge, especially in early lactation, when
dry matter intake may be limited. As can be seen in Table 2, not only
does the requirement for nutrients increase with higher milk production,
but also the nutrient density because of the limited intake.
The first approach to meeting
her needs is having the best quality forage available. To keep the rumen
functioning optimally, forage or roughage must make up 40 percent of the
cow's intake. Only high quality forages (see suggested readings for references)
will allow rations to be as balanced as those in Table 3.
The grain portion of the ration
is often limited in energy. High energy feeds such as added fat or whole
seeds (such as cottonseed or soybean seed) are well utilized by the cow,
but because of their laxative effects, they should be used in limited
amounts.
The key to getting high milk
production is keeping the cow on feed. Every time the cow goes off feed
she will decrease her milk production. Not only is milk production lost,
but because some secretary tissue is lost, she never quite recovers her
production potential. If she can be kept on feed and healthy then she
has a chance to produce at her maximum.
You can do several things to
help the dairy cow to remain on feed. If ration ingredients must be changed,
especially forage, change them gradually over a two week period so both
the cow and the rumen microbes can adjust. Keeping fresh feed in front
of the cow also helps stimulate intake, while frequent feedings encourage
the cow to return to the feed bunk. Total mixed rations or at least frequent
feedings of grain will help maintain the rumen in balance and allow optimal
fermentation.
Milking three times a day has
been shown to increase milk production by 20 to 25 percent. This may be
helpful to high producing cows because milking relieves pressure build
up in the mammary gland and allows the gland to continue to produce milk.
However, if the feeding program is not adapted to the higher level of
milk production, the cow will lose body weight quicker, and the long-term
effect will be little or no increase in milk.
Summer heat can cause a 10
to 20 percent drop in milk production. This loss in milk production is
directly related to a decrease in intake and lower nutrient supply for
milk production. This is especially harmful to the high producer because
her body's nutrient stores are limited. You can do several things to keep
intake up. One approach is to increase the nutrient density of the ration
so the cow does not have to eat as much to meet her needs. Do this by
increasing the crude protein and energy content (Table 4). This method
is difficult because we must leave a minimal amount of fiber in the ration
to maintain fat production. Another approach is to provide shade, water
misters and fans around the feed area to encourage cows to eat and stay
at the feed area. Frequent feedings, especially during the cooler time
periods, and increased mineral feeding of electrolytes (NA, K and MG)
have been shown to help maintain intake and milk production, also. The
best approach to heat stress management is to use all of these approaches.
Each approach can contribute to maintaining dry matter intake and milk
production; however, the single most important item may be a ready and
plentiful supply of clean, fresh, cool water.
Managing the high producing
dairy cow requires that we make everything work all of the time. By observing
the cows that produced over 40,000 pounds, we have our guidelines for
managing the high producing herd. The key to getting our herd to producing
a high level of milk will be obtaining the highest level of management.
Bath, D.L., F.N. Dickinson,
H.A. Tucker and R.D. Appleman. 1985. "Dairy Cattle: Principles, Practices,
Problems, Profits." 3rd Edition. Lea & Febger.
Guthrie, L.D. 1979. "Balancing
Rations for Dairy Cattle." Bulletin 814, UGA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION
SERVICE.
Guthrie, L.D. 1980. "Feeding
the Dairy Herd." Bulletin 816, UGA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE.
Guthrie, L.D. 1981. "Silage
for Dairy Cattle." Bulletin 616, UGA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE.
Johnson, J.T. 1984. "Alfalfa
Production in Georgia." Bulletin 898, UGA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE.
Maddux, J.N. and W.G. Gilson.
1982. "Optimum Reproductive Efficiency in Dairy Herds." Bulletin
734, UGA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE.
Smith, James W. 1986. "Dairy
Herd Improvement Records, Their Need and Use." Bulletin 897, UGA
COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE.
Wilcox,C.J., H.H.VanHorn, B.Harris,Jr.,
H.H. Head, S.P. Marshall, W.W. Thatcher, D.W. Webb, and J.M. Wing. 1978.
"Large Dairy Herd Management." University of Florida Book.
| Table 1. Summary of
First 40,000+ Pound Milk Producers -- 365 Days |
| Name |
Year |
Times Milked |
Milk LB |
Test% |
Fat LB |
BodyWt. |
Milk:Body Wt.
Ratio |
| Carnation Ormsby Madcap Fayne |
1942 |
4x |
41943 |
3.3 |
1392 |
1800 |
23:1 |
| Green Meadow Lily Pabst |
1951 |
3x |
42805 |
2.9 |
1246 |
1400 |
30:1 |
| Mowry Leader Sis |
1967 |
2x |
40174 |
3.8 |
1522 |
1930 |
21:1 |
| Reinharts Arthur - Farms Balled |
1970 |
2x |
40981 |
3.2 |
1297 |
- |
- |
| Skagvale Graceful Hattie |
1971 |
2x |
44019 |
3.4 |
1505 |
1700 |
26:1 |
| Breezewood Patsy Bar Pontiac |
1974 |
2x |
45280 |
4.8 |
2194 |
1860 |
24:1 |
| Mowry Prince Corinne |
1974 |
2x |
50759 |
3.0 |
1548 |
1700 |
30:1 |
| Beecher Arlinda Ellen |
1975 |
2x |
55661 |
2.8 |
1572 |
1750 |
32:1 |
| Beecher Arlinda Ellen |
1977 |
2x |
48840 |
3.3 |
1624 |
1750 |
28:1 |
| Reference: Cook,
T.L. and J.L. Albright. 1976. Holstein-Fresian World 73:1881-1883.
Since 1977, more than 37 cows have made records over 40,000 pounds
of milk, according to Holstein-Fresian Association records. |
| Table
2. Requirements for Different Levels of Milk Production |
|
Pounds
of Milk/Day |
| Item |
Unit |
20 |
30 |
40 |
50 |
60 |
70 |
80 |
| Dry
Matter Intake |
lb. |
33.9 |
35.6 |
38.8 |
41.3 |
44.3 |
47.6 |
50.9 |
|
% |
2.51 |
2.64 |
2.87 |
3.06 |
3.28 |
3.53 |
3.77 |
| Crude
Protein |
lb. |
3.54 |
4.42 |
5.30 |
6.17 |
7.06 |
8.03 |
9.02 |
|
% |
10.5 |
12.2 |
13.6 |
14.9 |
15.9 |
16.9 |
17.7 |
| Net
Energy |
Mcal. |
18.6 |
22.3 |
26.0 |
29.7 |
33.5 |
37.7 |
41.9 |
|
% |
55. |
62. |
67. |
72. |
76. |
79. |
82. |
| Crude
Fiber |
lb. |
5.4 |
5.8 |
6.2 |
6.6 |
7.1 |
6.6 |
7.1 |
|
% |
16.0 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
14.0 |
14.0 |
| Calcium |
lb. |
.14 |
.18 |
.22 |
.26 |
.29 |
.34 |
.38 |
|
% |
.43 |
.5 |
.57 |
.63 |
.67 |
.71 |
.75 |
| Phosphorus |
lb. |
.11 |
.14 |
.16 |
.19 |
.22 |
.25 |
.28 |
|
% |
.32 |
.38 |
.42 |
.47 |
.5 |
.53 |
.56 |
| Body
weight = 1350 pounds, 3.8% fat, 1.20 lead factor. |
| Reference:
Ely, Lane. 1985. Requirements in the DART Program for Milk Production.
Handout. |
| Table
3. Rations for 80 Pounds of Milk |
|
Ration |
| Ingredient |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
Pounds
per Cow per Day |
| Corn
Silage |
81.0 |
65.0 |
|
| Alfalfa
Hay |
-- |
20.1 |
25.2 |
| Corn |
18.8 |
20.1 |
2.0 |
| Soybeanmeal
44 |
10.2 |
8.5 |
2.0 |
| Dical
Phos |
.15 |
-- |
-- |
| Limestone |
.69 |
.69 |
.32 |
| Phosphorus |
.41 |
.55 |
.65 |
| Trace
Mineral Salt |
.2 |
.2 |
.2 |
| Dyna-mate |
-- |
-- |
.04 |
| Reference:
Ely, Lane. 1984. DART Rations. |
| Table
4. Effect of Shade or Sun and High or Low Roughage Ration on Milk
Production and Dry Matter Intake |
|
Shade |
|
Sun |
| High |
Low |
|
High |
Low |
| Milk
(lb/day) |
51.7 |
51.7 |
|
43.8 |
49.1 |
| DM
Intake (lb) |
39.9 |
39.4 |
|
35.6 |
37.1 |
| Roughage:Grain,
% |
69:31 |
41:59 |
|
67:33 |
37:63 |
| Guthrie,
et.al., J. Dairy Sci. 51:969. |
Circular 788/April,
1986
The University of
Georgia and Ft. Valley State College, the U.S. Department of Agriculture
and counties of the state cooperating. The Cooperative Extension Service
offers educational programs, assistance and materials to all people without
regard to race, color, national origin, age, sex or disability.
An
Equal Opportunity Employer/Affirmative Action Organization Committed to
a Diverse Work Force
Issued in furtherance
of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 18 and June 30, 1914, The University
of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences and the
U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating.
Gale
A. Buchanan, Dean and Director
|