Drought
Management for Cotton Production
Introduction
Cotton
is considered one of the most drought-tolerant field crops grown in the
southeastern United States. Yet it responds well to sufficient water by
producing yields proportional to rainfall or supplemental irrigation. For
nearly 200 years, it was grown in the southeast almost exclusively under
nonirrigated or rainfed conditions. However, growers are well aware of the
need for timely rainfall in April and May to get stands established and
in the summer months to sustain fruiting. A common saying among them is,
"If you get rain in July, you go to the gin in September." Notable southeastern
dry years in modern times include the infamous 1954, 1977, 1980, 1981, 1986,
1988, 1990, and 1993. Many cotton growers were bankrupted by drought and
boll weevils during the 1920s and 1930s. Boll weevils have been successfully
eradicated in most southeastern states, but droughts--such as the one in
1993--still cause disastrous cotton yields. Economic losses are significant
due to the relatively high cost of growing cotton. Drought is rated by far
the greatest cause of disasters of cotton and other crops in the Southeast
by the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation. Much research has been devoted
to more efficient water use. The reversal of cotton's migration to the irrigated
valleys of the West indicate the increasing cost of water and the volume
of natural rainfall. Therefore rainfed cotton production, an enterprise
not without risk, appears once again to be economically feasible here. However,
the water available from rainfall and supplemental irrigation to produce
profitable yields will ultimately determine the success of southeastern
cotton in the post-boll weevil eradication era.
Cotton
Water Needs
Drought
before bloom can reduce the number of fruiting branches produced by first
bloom. However, drought is rarely severe enough to cause fruit shed before
bloom in the Southeast because of the relatively low water demands that
squares development exerts on the plant. As the crop begins to bloom it
must begin filling bolls. This process causes the plant's demand for water
to rise dramatically as more and more bolls are produced as shown in Figure
1. Drought will not only slow down plant development but will cause the
plant to shed small bolls and squares due to this increased demand for water.
Drought following bloom has the greatest effect on cotton yield and lint
quality. (Show figure.)
Irrigation
Cotton
is an excellent candidate for irrigated land particularly in areas that
frequently have drought periods during July 1 through August 20 and on coarse-textured,
sandy land. During peak blooming, cotton will use about 0.3 to 0.4 inch
of water per day. Irrigated cotton yields have been from zero to more than
800 pounds per acre greater than nonirrigated yields, with the most frequently
reported increases being in the 200 to 400 pounds per acre range.
The
following procedure is suggested for 900 to 1,200 pounds per acre yields:
Before first bloom irrigate with 0.75 to l.0 inch of water whenever wilting
of plants is observed by midday. Continue applying 0.75 to 1.0 inch of
water at the first sign of drought stress before first bloom. It should
be recognized that abundant moisture magnifies vegetative growth problems
when excessive nitrogen is available, insect control is insufficient,
or both. After first bloom, irrigate as needed to supply the quantities
of water listed in Table 1. Rain gauges should be used to measure the
water received from rain and the amount supplied by irrigation.
Table 1. Cotton Irrigation Schedules Suggested for High Yields
|
| 900
to 1,200 lb/A
| 1,300 to 1,600
lb/A
|
|
| In./Week
| In./Day
| In./Week
| In./Day
|
| Week beginning
at 1st bloom
|
1.0
| 0.15
| 1.5
| 0.22
|
| 2nd week after
1st bloom
| 1.5
| 0.22
| 1.5
| 0.22
|
| 3rd week after
1st bloom
| 2.0
| 0.30
| 2.5
| 0.36
|
| 4th week after
1st bloom
| 2.0
| 0.30
| 2.5
| 0.36
|
| 5th week after
1st bloom
| 1.5
| 0.22
| 2.5
| 0.36
|
| 6th week after
1st bloom
|
1.5
| 0.22
| 2.0
| 0.30
|
| 7th week after
1st bloom
| 1.0
| 0.15
| 2.0
| 0.30
|
| Weekly
quantities should be increased to compensate for runoff.
|
Examine the crop during the seventh week (900 to 1,200 pounds) and eighth
week (1,300 to 1,600 pounds) to determine if irrigation should be continued.
Additional irrigation may be needed if hot dry conditions are predicted
and the plants are experiencing wilt.
Irrigation
intervals can be determined by dividing the quantity per day for a period
into one-half to two-thirds the available moisture-holding capacity of
the upper 2 feet of soil in fields. For example, if the available moisture
capacity of the soil is 0.7 inch per foot and the quantity per day is
0.3 inch, the interval between irrigations or following rain that brings
soil moisture to field capacity would be:
0.66% x 2 ft x 0.7 in./ft
_________________________ = 3.08 or 3 days
0.3 in./day
Intervals
for most of the season will be three to four days for coarse-textured sand,
four to six days for more productive loamy sand and sandy loam, and five
to eight days for fine-textured sandy loam or "clay". A four- to six-day
interval will fit a majority of the situations.
Experience
over the past decade soundly indicates 900 to 1,200 pounds per acre or
better yields can be expected with the above seven-week irrigation scheduling
technique. Although there have been several reports and many feel that
more water is needed for higher, three-bale-plus yields. Rainfall-irrigation-yield
histories from several locations with water supplies of 14 to 16 inches
during the first seven to eight weeks of blooming show yields of 1,300
to 1,600 pounds per acre.
Growers
with intensely managed production programs that are already harvesting
two-bale yields and are striving for three-bale-plus yields on part of
their crop may want to increase the amount of water supplied by irrigating
to provide the quantities of water listed on the right side of Table 1
on a trial basis. This will provide four inches more during the seven-week
period than is suggested for two-bale yields.
Irrigation
Efficiency. One factor that has not received much attention is the
efficiency of the irrigation system in delivering water. Nonuniform water
application by an irrigation system may cause uneven growth patterns in
a field. Worn nozzles on the irrigation system may need to be replaced
to correct the nonuniformity problem. Another option may be to change
the type of sprinkler packages on the center pivot.
You
have several options when determining what type of nozzles to use when
retrofitting an old--or purchasing a new--center pivot system. All of
the water that is emitted from a nozzle does not reach the soil surface.
Water is usually lost due to evaporation, wind drift and crop canopy losses.
The ratio of the water that reaches the ground to the water that leaves
the nozzle is called water application efficiency (WAE). Placing the most
efficient type of nozzle on a system will make a difference in the amount
of water that enters the soil.
A
study was conducted in Georgia in 1992 evaluating different nozzle types
on a peanut grower's center pivot irrigation system. The system was equipped
with three different nozzle types to determine the water application efficiency
of different nozzles. They were:
- Conventional
low-angle, impact-type sprinklers (IMPACT).
- Low-pressure
spray nozzles on drops at truss rod height (LDN).
- Low-pressure
spray nozzles on drops at about 18 inches above ground (LEPA).
Table
2 shows the WAE for each package. The study shows that the LDN and LEPA
nozzles were 13 and 15 percent more efficient than the IMPACT nozzles during
daytime conditions, respectively. There was more effect on WAE of impact-type
sprinklers for day versus night conditions than the other sprinkler packages
demonstrated. This water savings could be beneficial, if the irrigation
water supply is marginal.
Table 2. Summary of Water Application Efficiency for Three Sprinkler
Packages
|
| IRRIGATION
EFFICIENCY
|
|
TYPE OF SPRINKLER PACKAGE
| DAY
| NIGHT
|
| Low-Angle Impact
on Top of Pivot (IMPACT)
| 77%
| 82%
|
| Spray Nozzles
on Drops at Truss Rods (LDN)
| 90%
| 93%
|
| Spray Nozzles
on Drops 18" Above Ground (LEPA)
| 92%
| 93%
|
Water Conservation. When center pivot systems are operated on soils
with relatively low water infiltration rates or on undulating soils, a significant
amount of water runoff can result. Excessive runoff can also occur after
a large rainfall. Runoff results in additional irrigation costs, uneven
water infiltration throughout the field, and soil erosion. A water-saving
technique called furrow diking may be beneficial in conserving water. Furrow
diking is an interrow tillage technique which forms small dikes in the furrow
approximately every 5 feet. The small dikes restrict rainfall or irrigation
water from flowing to a different location in the field. Furrow diking has
been extensively investigated in cotton on the rolling plains and high plains
of Texas. Increases in cotton lint yields have ranged from 11 to 16 percent
when alternate rows are diked and from 32 to 36 percent when all rows are
diked. Based on rainfall records, dikes are expected to increase yields
in 17 out of 20 years in these areas of cotton production. Diking has been
demonstrated in Georgia with limited success in irrigated fields. A drawback
of diking in the Southeast is that the plant height is greater than in Texas.
Texas growers are able to remove the dikes before harvest, which eliminates
picker bounce. A system of removing dikes would probably make diking acceptable
in the Southeast.
Management
Alternatives
Cultivars.
Full-season varieties have a more indeterminate type of growth that makes
them more likely to "rebound" when a serious drought is relieved. If enough
time remains after drought relief, then full-season varieties often can
make a top crop. Full-season varieties are a good choice for droughty soils
as long as they can be planted on time.
Short-season
varieties often load up quickly and cut out early due to drought. Cut-out
due to drought seems to be more "permanent in nature" the shorter the
maturity of the variety.
There
is usually little difference in performance of different maturity groups
affected by severe and prolonged drought which is not relieved by rain
in time to allow cotton to "rebound." Occasionally, short-season varieties
outperform full-season varieties when the timing of a prolonged drought
favors an early variety. In any case, success with full-season varieties
requires timely planting, especially on droughty soils which cannot be
irrigated.
Tillage
and Residue Management. Many soils in the Southeast form hardpans
which restrict root growth. Any restriction in root development can increase
the severity of a drought. You should dig up roots to ensure that the
taproot is developing straight downwards. Roots that turn sideways are
an indication that your tillage system is not providing a good environment
for root development. Plants with roots turned sideways will not be able
to use water deep in the soil and will suffer from drought earlier than
plants that have good root systems. Tillage that eliminates compaction
problems or hardpans will allow the root to develop downwards to obtain
moisture from a greater depth of soil. This will permit the crop to pass
through short periods of drought during the season without stunting or
severe fruit shed. Where irrigation is available it will make irrigation
scheduling less critical.
Underrow
subsoiling and bedding will disrupt hardpans that are problems especially
in sands and loamy sand soil that does not have enough silt or clay to
be sticky, gummy or slick when wet. Most hardpans are located between
the depths of 8 to 12 inches. Their presence and depth can be determined
by probing the soil with a "T"-shaped steel rod about 30 inches in length
with a point at the bottom of the "T". If the operation is performed about
two weeks before planting, any rain that occurs will be conserved. At
planting this will allow the beds to be conditioned and the dry soil removed
allowing seeds to be planted in firm moist soil. In conservation tillage,
underrow subsoiling will accomplish the same goals.
No-till
and reduced tillage systems are increasing in the Southeast. Research
in North Carolina suggests that in dry years reduced tillage systems will
outperform conventional tillage systems. Conversely the same studies show
that in wet years conventional tillage outperforms reduced tillage. Studies
conducted on silt loam soils that do not respond to subsoiling in north
Alabama have shown that no-till cotton planted into a small grain cover
crop can yield as much as conventional cotton. In these Alabama studies
no-till cotton without a cover did not yield as well as no-till cotton
with a cover or conventional cotton in dry years. The reason for higher
yields associated with cover crops in dry years is thought to be due to
one or more of the following factors: increased infiltration of rainfall,
less evaporation of moisture, increased organic matter, and reduced compaction.
Cultivation.
Excess cultivation can dry out soil and increase problems related to drought.
Cultivating too deeply (more than 1 to 2 inches depending on the size
of cotton) can prune roots and reduce the plant's ability to extract moisture.
Excess cultivation and cultivating too deeply are more of a problem as
the plant gets larger and begins to square.
Cultural
Practices. Low plant populations (preferably two plants per foot and
not more than three or four) will generally yield more than higher plant
populations under drought conditions. When making replant decisions you
should keep in mind that low plant populations do well in the Southeast
especially in dry years. Avoid high plant populations on sandy, droughty
fields.
Fertilization.
While sufficient levels of nutrients help plants withstand water shortages,
the uptake of nutrients--especially of nitrogen (N) and potassium (K)--is
reduced by drought stress. Fertilization should be based on soil tests
and realistic yield expectation to avoid excess fertilizer costs when
drought reduces yield. In addition, high nitrogen rates in drought years
often cause regrowth and defoliation problems when drought-stressed crops
receive rain between cut-out and harvest.
Reasonable
soil-applied N and K rates are advisable since supplemental foliar applications
can be used to correct mid-to-late-season deficiencies. These are best
determined by petiole testing. However, petiole nitrate and potassium
tests are less reliable as drought stress intensifies since nutrient uptake
decreases. Therefore, during periods when drought stress induces wilting
by noon, supplemental foliar applications are not usually recommended
even though petiole tests show deficient levels of these nutrients.
Pest
Management. Seedling diseases can be nonlethal and still have a detrimental
effect on the root system of a cotton plant. Root systems that are weakened
by diseases can not extract as much moisture as healthy root systems during
dry weather. Seedling diseases usually do not cause problems unless the
soil is both cool and wet; sandy, droughty soils are less likely to have
economic levels of seedling disease pressure.
Drought
can have a major impact on insect pressure. Drought will usually reduce
budworm, bollworm, and European corn borer pressure because the drought-stressed
plants are less attractive and these insects have a harder time getting
established during drought. Frequent and diligent scouting for these pests
may result in fewer applications in dry years.
On
the other hand, beet armyworm and fall armyworm pressure can be higher
in dry years. The likelihood of higher beet armyworm pressure increases
with early-season sprays to control plant bugs, weevils, and second generation
budworms. The farther south in the Southeast you are, the more likely
that the increased pressure from armyworms will be more significant than
reduced bollworm pressure in dry years.
Drought
tends to reduce aphid numbers. However, it may be argued that aphid feeding
is more damaging when water is limiting. Spider mites are generally associated
with dry weather but have not had a serious economic impact on the Southeast
in recent years.
Defoliation.
A drought that is not relieved in time to make a top crop forces the crop
to be early since the small bolls and squares are shed which compress
the fruiting period into two or three weeks of effective bloom. Growers
need to be aware of the effects this compression of the fruiting period
has on maturity and defoliation. Early crops can usually be defoliated
before the "normal" rule of thumb of 60 percent open. The only way to
know for sure when defoliation is safe is to cut bolls open and examine
them. You should begin examining bolls when the crop is 30 to 40 percent
open in drought years. Because drought makes a crop earlier, the tendency
is to wait until the crop is past the "normal" 60 percent open to ensure
mature fiber. Delaying defoliation beyond that stage increases the chances
of high micronaire (mike) cotton.
The
section on fertilization above addresses residual N problems that often
occur in drought-stressed cotton. Your cotton may look like it could not
regrow but if rains return and N is available you will probably see regrowth
occur quickly. Because of this regrowth potential the addition of regrowth
control materials to defoliant mixtures is often a good idea. Dropp uptake
is reduced by drought; growers may need to increase rates during drought.
Ginners
need to be aware that drought will cause cotton to open earlier. Gins
need to be started earlier in drought years to allow growers to defoliate
earlier. Growers without module builders cannot defoliate if a gin is
not available. This is due to regrowth that will more likely be a problem
soon after the cotton is defoliated. It is also important that gins be
open so that if regrowth does become a problem growers can pick through
the regrowth and gin quickly.
Drought-stressed
cotton that does not produce a great amount of regrowth may not need defoliation.
How much regrowth occurs will vary from field to field. Drought-stressed
cotton will often drop about half its leaves naturally by harvest time.
If this is the case and regrowth is not severe and the cotton is dry,
you should be able to harvest without defoliation. Remember that green
material is easier to remove at the gin than dry material. If cotton is
not defoliated, you should take care to put cotton in trailers or if modules
are used, the cotton should be ginned within three days. High levels of
green thrash in harvested material will cause a module to heat and increase
light-spot (or lower) grades. Cotton placed in modules at questionable
moisture content should be checked daily for internal temperature rise
for the first five to seven days. If there is a temperature rise of 15
to 20 degrees Fahrenheit or if the temperature reaches 110 degrees Fahrenheit,
the module should be ginned immediately. Nondefoliated cotton should not
be placed in modules if it cannot be ginned quickly. If you are trying
to decide if defoliation is justified, always pick a trailer without defoliation
to see how it cleans up at the gin. When harvesting without defoliation,
an oil-based spindle wetting agent is preferable to a surfactant type
to reduce green stains and cause spindle twist problems.
Harvesting.
Harvesting short cotton can be a little difficult if the bolls are closer
to the ground than normal. Bolls close to the ground only have one chance
of being picked since there are no spindles below them. For this reason,
it is very important to have good sharp spindles especially at the bottom
five or six rows on the drum when harvesting short cotton. Remember that
these spindles are subjected to more dirt and wear and tear than spindles
higher on the drum and are more likely to need replacing in a normal year.
The
other major differences in harvesting cotton close to the ground is that
you have to put the head on the ground and go slow. Scrapping (second
picking) is not likely to be justified on short drought-stressed cotton.
If you intend to harvest cotton once over, you should adjust the tension
and clearance of compression sheets (pressure plates or crowder plates)
so that you are not leaving a significant number of bolls and tags. This
will increase trash in the cotton but will allow you to harvest the maximum
amount of seed cotton. A good rule of thumb is to allow a 3/4- to 1-inch
clearance on early green cotton and to decrease clearance with more mature
cotton. Tension should be set at about 20 pounds for larger plants with
green bolls and 40 pounds for small plants with short limbs.
Make
sure that stalk lifters are adjusted to lift branches up to a height where
the lower bolls will come in contact with the lower rows of spindles.
Get your picker's operator manual out and go over all adjustments before
you go to the field.
Prepared
by
Keith
Edmisten, Extension Cotton Specialist, North Carolina Cooperative Extension
Service, North Carolina State University
Johnny
Crawford, Extension Cotton Specialist, Georgia Cooperative Extension Service,
University of Georgia
Mike
Bader, Extension Engineer, Georgia Cooperative Extension Service, University
of Georgia
The
use of brand names in this publication does not imply endorsement of the
products or services named or criticism of similar ones not mentioned.
This file is one in a series of electronically available drought information
publications produced with support from the U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Extension Service, under special project number 93-EFRA-1-0013. The Drought
Disaster Recovery Project was a joint effort of the Extension Services
in Delaware, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia. It
is distributed in furtherance of the Acts of Congress of May 8 and June
30, 1914. Employment and program opportunities are offered to all people
regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability. State
land-grant institutions,U.S. Department of Agriculture, and local governments
cooperating.
Electronic
Publication Number DRO-17 (Originally published December 1994) |