|
The University of Georgia College of Agricultural & Environmental
Sciences
Cooperative Extension Service
Managing the
High Producing Dairy Cow
Lane 0.
Ely and Larry D. Guthrie, Extension Dairy Scientists
Contents
40,000 Pounds of Milk
Lactation/Gestation Cycle
Feeding
Maintaining Intake
Milking
Heat Stress
Management
Suggested Readings
All dairy farmers would like to increase milk production from their cows.
If we examine the DHIA records, milk production has been increasing steadily
over the years. Still there is a long way to go for the average herd to
become a top herd. What is a high producing dairy cow? Many herds today
have rolling herd averages of over 20,000 pounds of milk and many cows
are producing over 30,000 pounds of milk. The Georgia DHIA rolling herd
average, however, is 13,500 pounds of milk. To see what changes we can
make, let's examine the individual record holder.
Beecher Arlinda Ellen set the production record in 1975 by producing
55,661 pounds of milk in 365 days (Table 1). Her top production day was
195 pounds and she averaged 152.5 pounds of milk per day. She milked 112
pounds on her last test day. During the peak of lactation she ate over
65 pounds of 16 percent commercial grain, 70 pounds of alfalfa hay, and
she drank 50 to 60 gallons of water per day. Ellen was an exceptional
cow in both milk production and her ability to eat. She consumed over
7 percent of body weight as dry matter the average cow eats 3 to 5 percent
of her body weight. Ellen was fed frequently and always had fresh feed
available. Her owners commented on her agressive eating habits and easy
disposition. She liked interaction with people and other animals.
We can see many of Ellen's characteristics in the 20,000 pound herds.
We want to be able to take advantage of them so our cows can express their
genetic potential and efficiency. Even though costs will increase with
higher production; returns will increase more.
All cows go through a lactation/gestation cycle which can be divided
into five groupings. The first period of the lactational cycle is peak
milk production. During this period the high producing cow must draw upon
body reserves to meet her nutritional requirements. Usually the high producing
cow will lose body weight during this period.
The second period is when maximum dry matter intake occurs. This level
of intake will determine the shape of the milk production curve as the
cow starts to decline in milk production. Body weight will stabilize and
may show a slight increase. Cows should be bred by the early part of this
period in order to maintain a reasonable calving interval.
The third period of the lactational cycle is a period of excess nutrient
intake and gain of body stores for the next lactation. Body weight increases
so that the cow reaches the desired calving weight by the end of this
period. This phase may not occur in high producing herds because of the
high level of milk production. With high milk production, cows may never
reach a period of excess nutrient intake. The quality of the ration will
be all the more critical because the cow will not have a large body reserve
to draw on in the subsequent lactation.
The fourth period is the typical dry cow period where the goal is to
restore the rumen to a healthy fermentation vat. This is accomplished
by feeding a ration composed of long hay. Body weight changes should be
positive but not large.
The last period in the lactational cycle is the close-up dry period.
This is a transitional phase that allows the cow to adjust to the milking
herd ration and to being moved into the milking herd.
Feeding the high producing dairy cow is a continual challenge, especially
in early lactation, when dry matter intake may be limited. As can be seen
in Table 2, not only does the requirement for nutrients increase with
higher milk production, but also the nutrient density because of the limited
intake.
The first approach to meeting her needs is having the best quality forage
available. To keep the rumen functioning optimally, forage or roughage
must make up 40 percent of the cow's intake. Only high quality forages
(see suggested readings for references) will allow rations to be as balanced
as those in Table 3.
The grain portion of the ration is often limited in energy. High energy
feeds such as added fat or whole seeds (such as cottonseed or soybean
seed) are well utilized by the cow, but because of their laxative effects,
they should be used in limited amounts.
The key to getting high milk production is keeping the cow on feed. Every
time the cow goes off feed she will decrease her milk production. Not
only is milk production lost, but because some secretary tissue is lost,
she never quite recovers her production potential. If she can be kept
on feed and healthy then she has a chance to produce at her maximum.
You can do several things to help the dairy cow to remain on feed. If
ration ingredients must be changed, especially forage, change them gradually
over a two week period so both the cow and the rumen microbes can adjust.
Keeping fresh feed in front of the cow also helps stimulate intake, while
frequent feedings encourage the cow to return to the feed bunk. Total
mixed rations or at least frequent feedings of grain will help maintain
the rumen in balance and allow optimal fermentation.
Milking three times a day has been shown to increase milk production
by 20 to 25 percent. This may be helpful to high producing cows because
milking relieves pressure build up in the mammary gland and allows the
gland to continue to produce milk. However, if the feeding program is
not adapted to the higher level of milk production, the cow will lose
body weight quicker, and the long-term effect will be little or no increase
in milk.
Summer heat can cause a 10 to 20 percent drop in milk production. This
loss in milk production is directly related to a decrease in intake and
lower nutrient supply for milk production. This is especially harmful
to the high producer because her body's nutrient stores are limited. You
can do several things to keep intake up. One approach is to increase the
nutrient density of the ration so the cow does not have to eat as much
to meet her needs. Do this by increasing the crude protein and energy
content (Table 4). This method is difficult because we must leave a minimal
amount of fiber in the ration to maintain fat production. Another approach
is to provide shade, water misters and fans around the feed area to encourage
cows to eat and stay at the feed area. Frequent feedings, especially during
the cooler time periods, and increased mineral feeding of electrolytes
(NA, K and MG) have been shown to help maintain intake and milk production,
also. The best approach to heat stress management is to use all of these
approaches. Each approach can contribute to maintaining dry matter intake
and milk production; however, the single most important item may be a
ready and plentiful supply of clean, fresh, cool water.
Managing the high producing dairy cow requires that we make everything
work all of the time. By observing the cows that produced over 40,000
pounds, we have our guidelines for managing the high producing herd. The
key to getting our herd to producing a high level of milk will be obtaining
the highest level of management.
Bath, D.L., F.N. Dickinson, H.A. Tucker and R.D. Appleman. 1985. "Dairy
Cattle: Principles, Practices, Problems, Profits." 3rd Edition. Lea
& Febger.
Guthrie, L.D. 1979. "Balancing Rations for Dairy Cattle." Bulletin
814, UGA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE.
Guthrie, L.D. 1980. "Feeding the Dairy Herd." Bulletin 816,
UGA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE.
Guthrie, L.D. 1981. "Silage for Dairy Cattle." Bulletin 616,
UGA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE.
Johnson, J.T. 1984. "Alfalfa Production in Georgia." Bulletin
898, UGA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE.
Maddux, J.N. and W.G. Gilson. 1982. "Optimum Reproductive Efficiency
in Dairy Herds." Bulletin 734, UGA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE.
Smith, James W. 1986. "Dairy Herd Improvement Records, Their Need
and Use." Bulletin 897, UGA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE.
Wilcox,C.J., H.H.VanHorn, B.Harris,Jr., H.H. Head, S.P. Marshall, W.W.
Thatcher, D.W. Webb, and J.M. Wing. 1978. "Large Dairy Herd Management."
University of Florida Book.
| Table 1. Summary of
First 40,000+ Pound Milk Producers -- 365 Days |
| Name |
Year |
Times Milked |
Milk LB |
Test% |
Fat LB |
BodyWt. |
Milk:Body Wt.
Ratio |
| Carnation Ormsby Madcap Fayne |
1942 |
4x |
41943 |
3.3 |
1392 |
1800 |
23:1 |
| Green Meadow Lily Pabst |
1951 |
3x |
42805 |
2.9 |
1246 |
1400 |
30:1 |
| Mowry Leader Sis |
1967 |
2x |
40174 |
3.8 |
1522 |
1930 |
21:1 |
| Reinharts Arthur - Farms Balled |
1970 |
2x |
40981 |
3.2 |
1297 |
- |
- |
| Skagvale Graceful Hattie |
1971 |
2x |
44019 |
3.4 |
1505 |
1700 |
26:1 |
| Breezewood Patsy Bar Pontiac |
1974 |
2x |
45280 |
4.8 |
2194 |
1860 |
24:1 |
| Mowry Prince Corinne |
1974 |
2x |
50759 |
3.0 |
1548 |
1700 |
30:1 |
| Beecher Arlinda Ellen |
1975 |
2x |
55661 |
2.8 |
1572 |
1750 |
32:1 |
| Beecher Arlinda Ellen |
1977 |
2x |
48840 |
3.3 |
1624 |
1750 |
28:1 |
| Reference: Cook,
T.L. and J.L. Albright. 1976. Holstein-Fresian World 73:1881-1883.
Since 1977, more than 37 cows have made records over 40,000 pounds
of milk, according to Holstein-Fresian Association records. |
| Table 2. Requirements
for Different Levels of Milk Production |
|
Pounds of
Milk/Day |
| Item |
Unit |
20 |
30 |
40 |
50 |
60 |
70 |
80 |
| Dry Matter Intake |
lb. |
33.9 |
35.6 |
38.8 |
41.3 |
44.3 |
47.6 |
50.9 |
|
% |
2.51 |
2.64 |
2.87 |
3.06 |
3.28 |
3.53 |
3.77 |
| Crude Protein |
lb. |
3.54 |
4.42 |
5.30 |
6.17 |
7.06 |
8.03 |
9.02 |
|
% |
10.5 |
12.2 |
13.6 |
14.9 |
15.9 |
16.9 |
17.7 |
| Net Energy |
Mcal. |
18.6 |
22.3 |
26.0 |
29.7 |
33.5 |
37.7 |
41.9 |
|
% |
55. |
62. |
67. |
72. |
76. |
79. |
82. |
| Crude Fiber |
lb. |
5.4 |
5.8 |
6.2 |
6.6 |
7.1 |
6.6 |
7.1 |
|
% |
16.0 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
14.0 |
14.0 |
| Calcium |
lb. |
.14 |
.18 |
.22 |
.26 |
.29 |
.34 |
.38 |
|
% |
.43 |
.5 |
.57 |
.63 |
.67 |
.71 |
.75 |
| Phosphorus |
lb. |
.11 |
.14 |
.16 |
.19 |
.22 |
.25 |
.28 |
|
% |
.32 |
.38 |
.42 |
.47 |
.5 |
.53 |
.56 |
| Body weight = 1350 pounds,
3.8% fat, 1.20 lead factor. |
| Reference: Ely, Lane. 1985.
Requirements in the DART Program for Milk Production. Handout. |
| Table 3. Rations for
80 Pounds of Milk |
|
Ration |
| Ingredient |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
Pounds per Cow per Day |
| Corn Silage |
81.0 |
65.0 |
|
| Alfalfa Hay |
-- |
20.1 |
25.2 |
| Corn |
18.8 |
20.1 |
2.0 |
| Soybeanmeal 44 |
10.2 |
8.5 |
2.0 |
| Dical Phos |
.15 |
-- |
-- |
| Limestone |
.69 |
.69 |
.32 |
| Phosphorus |
.41 |
.55 |
.65 |
| Trace Mineral Salt |
.2 |
.2 |
.2 |
| Dyna-mate |
-- |
-- |
.04 |
| Reference: Ely, Lane. 1984.
DART Rations. |
| Table 4. Effect of
Shade or Sun and High or Low Roughage Ration on Milk Production and
Dry Matter Intake |
|
Shade |
|
Sun |
| High |
Low |
|
High |
Low |
| Milk (lb/day) |
51.7 |
51.7 |
|
43.8 |
49.1 |
| DM Intake (lb) |
39.9 |
39.4 |
|
35.6 |
37.1 |
| Roughage:Grain, % |
69:31 |
41:59 |
|
67:33 |
37:63 |
| Guthrie, et.al., J.
Dairy Sci. 51:969. |
Circular 788/April, 1986
The University of Georgia and Ft. Valley State College,
the U.S. Department of Agriculture and counties of the state cooperating.
The Cooperative Extension Service offers educational programs, assistance
and materials to all people without regard to race, color, national origin,
age, sex or disability.
An Equal Opportunity Employer/Affirmative
Action Organization Committed to a Diverse Work Force
Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work,
Acts of May 18 and June 30, 1914, The University of Georgia College of
Agricultural and Environmental Sciences and the U.S. Department of Agriculture
cooperating.
Gale A. Buchanan, Dean and Director
UGA CAES Drought Information
|